ORIGINAL ARTICLE
IMPACT OF INSTITUTIONAL ECONOMY ON THE WAY OF SCIENTIFIC COGNITION IN MARKETING
 
More details
Hide details
1
doc. dr Jacek Kamiński, Pope John Paul II State School of Higher Education in Biała Podlaska, Chair of Economics and Management, Sidorska 95/97, 21-500 Biała Podlaska, Poland; phone: +48 83 344-99-05
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Jacek Kamiński   

Pope John Paul II State School of Higher Education in Biała Podlaska Państwowa Szkoła Wyższa im. Papieża Jana Pawła II w Białej Podlaskiej
Publication date: 2018-07-05
 
Economic and Regional Studies 2016;9(3):5–19
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Subject and purpose of work: The article discusses the problem of the relationship between marketing science and institutional economy. Its goal is to examine the impact of institutional economy on the way of scientific cognition in marketing. Materials and methods: The article was prepared on the basis of the study of the relevant Polish and foreign research literature, particularly concerning marketing theory. The methodology of the present study is based on the considerations taken up in deduction with the support of descriptive and comparative analysis. Results: The impact of institutional economy on the method of scientific cognition in marketing results in the interest of marketing science not only in an enterprise but also in an effort to describe the external factors (externalities) and social costs related to marketing activities of enterprises. Of importance is also the understanding of the functioning of the structure of the marketing system as well as the reactions of the institutions responsible for the implementation of the country’s marketing policy. Conclusions: The analysis conducted for the purpose of this study leads to a general conclusion that marketing and science devoted to it are not homogeneous in epistemological terms and a significant dualism between the two can be pointed out. It encompasses traditional marketing which stems from management and marketing referring to the institutional economy of higher level.
 
REFERENCES (45)
1.
Alderson W. (1957), Marketing Behavior and Executive Action. Irwin, Homewood IL.
 
2.
Alderson W. (1965), Dynamic Marketing Behavior: A Functionalist Theory of Marketing. Irwin, Homewood, IL.
 
3.
Bartels R., Jenkins R.L. (1977), Macromarketing. Journal of Marketing, t. 41 nr 4, s. 17-20.
 
4.
Borland H., Lingreen A. (2012), Sustainability, Epistemology, Ecocentric, and Marketing Strategy. Ideology, Reality, and Vision. Journal of Business Ethics, t. 117, nr 1, s. 173-187.
 
5.
Breyer R.F. (1934), The Marketing Institution. McGraw-Hill, New York.
 
6.
Clark F.E. (1922), Principles of Marketing. Macmillan, New York.
 
7.
Clark F.E., Clark C.P. (1942), Principles of Marketing. Macmillan, New York.
 
8.
Dill W.R. (1958), Environment as an Influence on Managerial Activity. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2(4), s. 409-443.
 
9.
Dixon D.F. (2008), Consumer Sovereignty, Democracy and the Marketing Concept: A Macromarketing Perspective, W: M. Tadajewski, D. Brownlie (eds.), Critical Marketing. Issues in Contemporary Marketing. John Wiley & Sons, West Sussex, s.67-83.
 
10.
Duddy E.A., Revzan D.A. (1953), Marketing: An Institutional Approach. McGraw-Hill, New York.
 
11.
Ely R.T. (1893), Outlines of Economics. Hunt and Eaton, New York.
 
12.
Gorynia M., Kowalski T. (2013), Nauki ekonomiczne i ich klasyfikacja a wyzwania współczesnej gospodarki. Ekonomista, nr 4, s. 457-474.
 
13.
Holloway R.J., Hancock R.S. (1964), The Environment of Marketing Behavior. Wiley, New York.
 
14.
Holloway R.J., Hancock R.S. (1968), Marketing in Changing Environment. Wiley, New York.
 
15.
Hunt S.D. (2015), Marketing Theory. Foundations, Controversy, Strategy, Resource-Advantage Theory. Routledge, New York.
 
16.
Jones D.G., Monieson D.D. (1990), Early Development of the Philosophy of Marketing Thought. Journal of Marketing, 54 (January), s. 102-113.
 
17.
Kamiński J. (2009), Sto lat Harvard Business School. Wkład w rozwój wczesnego marketingu. Marketing i Rynek, nr 12, s. 2-8.
 
18.
Kamiński J. (2012a), Czym naprawdę jest makromarketing. Marketing i Rynek, nr 10, s. 2-9.
 
19.
Kamiński J. (2012b), O „Niektórych problemach dystrybucji rynkowej” A.W. Shawa w setną rocznicę pierwszego naukowego opracowania na temat marketingu. Marketing i Rynek, nr 2, s. 2-9.
 
20.
Kamiński J. (2012c). Starożytne źródła myśli marketingowej. Rozprawy Społeczne, VI (2), s. 15-22.
 
21.
Kamiński J. (2015), Makromarketing jako część nauki o marketingu. Zeszyty Naukowe Polityki Europejskie, Finanse i Marketing, nr 13 (62), s. 40-52.
 
22.
Kamiński J. (2016a), Refleksje nad zakresem nauki o marketingu jako dyscypliny naukowej - cz. 1. Marketing i Rynek, nr 6, s. 2-12.
 
23.
Kamiński J. (2016b), Refleksje nad zakresem nauki o marketingu jako dyscypliny naukowej - cz. 2. Marketing i Rynek, nr 7, s. 6-16.
 
24.
Kotler P. (1994), Marketing. Analiza, planowanie, wdrażanie i kontrola. Gebethner & Ska, Warszawa.
 
25.
Landreth H., Colander D.C. (2005), Historia myśli ekonomicznej. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.
 
26.
Mcmillan J. (2002), Reinventing the Bazaar – A Natural History of Markets. W.W. Norton & Company, New York 2002.
 
27.
Meade W.K., Nason R.W. (1991), Toward a Unified Theory of Macromarketing: A Systems Theoretic Approach. Journal of Macromarketing, 11(2), s. 72-82.
 
28.
Mittelstaedt J.D., Killbourne W.E., Mittelstaedt R.A. (2006), Macromarketing as a Agorology: Macromarketing Theory and the Study of the Agora. Journal of Macromarketing, t. 26 nr 2, s. 131-142.
 
29.
Mittelstaedt R.A., Mittelstaedt J.D. (2004), Macromarketing Approaches to Consumer Behavior: A Review and Research Agenda. W: J.D. Mittelstaedt, S.J. Shapiro (eds.), Papers of the 29th Annual Macromarketing Seminar. Clemson Univerity and Simon Fraser University, Vancouver.
 
30.
Nason R.W., White P.D. (1981), The Vision of Charles C. Slater: Social Consequences of Marketing. Journal of Macromarketing, 1 (Fall), s. 4-18.
 
31.
Sagan A. (2012), Paradygmaty marketingu – próba syntezy. Marketing i Rynek, nr 11, s. 2-10.
 
32.
Scott R.A., Marks N.E. (1968), Marketing and Its Environment. Wadworth, Belmond, CA .
 
33.
Pirson M., Valey R.J. (2014), Introduction. W: R.J. Valey, M. Pirson, (eds.), Humanistic Marketing, Pelgrave Macmillan.
 
34.
Smith C.N., Drumwright M.E., Gentile M.C. (2010), The New Marketing Myopia. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 29 (Spring), s. 4-11.
 
35.
Shaw E.H., Jones D.G. (2005), A History of Schools of Marketing Thought. Marketing Theory, t. 5 nr 3, s. 239-281.
 
36.
Shaw E.H., Jones D.G., McLean P.A. (2010), The Early Schools of Marketing Thought, W: P. McLaren, M. Saren, B. Stern, M. Tadajewski (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Marketing Theory, Sage, Los Angeles, s. 27-41.
 
37.
Sułkowski Ł. (2005), Epistemologia w naukach o zarządzaniu. Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne, Warszawa.
 
38.
Sułkowski Ł. (2012), Epistemologia i metodologia zarządzania. Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne, Warszawa.
 
39.
Szumilak J. (2005), W sprawie naukowego statusu marketingu. Marketing i Rynek, nr 8, s. 2-7.
 
40.
Shultz C.J. (2007), Macromarketing, W: G.T. Gundlach, L.G. Block, W.L. Wilkie (eds.), „Explorations of Marketing in Society”, Thompson, Mason, OH.
 
41.
Vaile R., Grether E., Cox R. (1952), Marketing in the American Economy. Ronald Press Co., New York.
 
42.
Weber M. (1957), Sens wolnej od wartościowania socjologii i ekonomii, W: E. Nowakowska-Sołtan (red.), Problemy socjologii wiedzy. PWN, Warszawa.
 
43.
Webster F.E. Jr., Lusch R.F. (2013), Elevating Marketing: Marketing Is Dead! Long Live Marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, nr 41, s. 396.
 
44.
Wilkie W.L., Moore E.S. (2003), Scholarly Research in Marketing: Exploring the „4 Eras” of Thought Development. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, nr 22(2), s. 116-146.
 
45.
Zif J. (1980), A Managerial Approach to Macromarketing. Journal of Marketing, t. 44 (Winter), s. 36-45.
 
eISSN:2451-182X
ISSN:2083-3725