ORIGINAL ARTICLE
CHANGES IN THE CORE-PERIPHERY STRUCTURE OF THE FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME’S REGIONAL NETWORK
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Faculty of Business and Economics, Department of Economics and Econometrics, University of Pécs, Hungary
 
 
Submission date: 2023-08-23
 
 
Final revision date: 2023-11-28
 
 
Acceptance date: 2023-11-29
 
 
Publication date: 2023-12-29
 
 
Corresponding author
Dávid Bilicz   

Faculty of Business and Economics, Department of Economics and Econometrics, University of Pécs, Rákóczi, 7632, Pécs, Hungary
 
 
Economic and Regional Studies 2023;16(4):489-504
 
KEYWORDS
JEL CLASSIFICATION CODES
E61
R11
R58
 
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Subject and purpose of work: The aim of this paper is to measure whether the regions lagging behind in the European knowledge field could get closer to the core of the Framework Programmes’ (FP) R&D network. Materials and methods: Annual snapshots of the network have been analysed between 2004- 2014. With the use of four different core-periphery measures, regions with converging and diverging tendencies have been identified. The author analysed how the results vary with different regions and indicators used. Results: The few core regions of the network in the eastern bloc tend to diverge from the core, while almost none of the peripheral regions in these countries could even get to the semi-periphery of the network in the examined timeframe. Conclusions: Although one of the goals of the EU with the European Research Area was to help peripheral regions catch up, this has not yet happened in the case of the examined collaborative R&D network.
PEER REVIEW INFORMATION
Article has been screened for originality
 
REFERENCES (27)
1.
Amoroso, S., Coad, A., Grassano, N. (2018). European R&D networks: a snapshot from the 7th EU Framework Programme. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 27(5-6), 404-419. https://doi.org/10.1080/104385....
 
2.
Arnold, E., Åström, T., Boekholt, P., Brown, N., Good, B., Holmberg, R., Meijter, I., Mostert, B., van der Veen, G. (2008). Impacts of the Framework Programme in Sweden. Stockholm: VINNOVA. Pobrane z: https://www.researchgate.net/p....
 
3.
Balland, P.A., Boschma, R., Ravet, J. (2019). Network dynamics in collaborative research in the EU, 2003– 2017. European Planning Studies, 27(9), 1811-1837. https://doi.org/10.1080/096543....
 
4.
Barabási, A.L., Albert, R. (1999). Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286(5439), 509-512. https://doi.org/10.1126/scienc....
 
5.
Bianchi, C., Galaso, P., Palomeque, S. (2021). Patent collaboration networks in Latin America: Extra-regional orientation and core-periphery structure. Journal of scientometric research, 10(1s), s59-s70. https://doi.org/10.5530/jscire....
 
6.
Bilicz, D. (2021). A hálózatok és a kapcsolatok szerepe az innovációban és a tudás áramlásában: Szisztematikus szakirodalmi áttekintés. Közgazdasági Szemle, 68(6), 674-698. https://doi.org/10.18414//ksz.....
 
7.
Borgatti, S.P., Everett, M.G. (2000). Models of core/periphery structures. Social networks, 21(4), 375-395. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-....
 
8.
Breschi, S., Cusmano, L. (2006). Unveiling the texture of a European Research Area: emergence of oligarchic networks under EU Framework Programmes. In: Caloghirou, Y. Constantelou, A. Vonortas, N. (red.), Knowledge flows in European industry (p. 294-324). London and New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/978020....
 
9.
Broekel, T. (2015). Do cooperative research and development (R&D) subsidies stimulate regional innovation efficiency? Evidence from Germany. Regional studies, 49(7), 1087-1110. https://doi.org/10.1080/003434....
 
10.
Chen, Z., Guan, J. (2016). The core‐peripheral structure of international knowledge flows: Evidence from patent citation data. R&D Management, 46(1), 62-79. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.1....
 
11.
Chessa, A., Morescalchi, A., Pammolli, F., Penner, O., Petersen, A.M., Riccaboni, M. (2013). Is Europe evolving toward an integrated research area? Science, 339(6120), 650-651. https://doi.org/10.1126/ science.1227970.
 
12.
Della Rossa, F., Dercole, F., Piccardi, C. (2013). Profiling core-periphery network structure by random walkers. Scientific reports, 3(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep01....
 
13.
Doreian, P., Woodard, K.L. (1994). Defining and locating cores and boundaries of social networks. Social networks, 16(4), 267-293. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8....
 
14.
Fisch, P. (2014). A first look at monetary (re-)distribution effects of Framework Programme 7. Think. Pieces (3). Pobrane z: https://www.peter-fisch.eu/eur....
 
15.
Fisch, P. (2018). Monetary distribution effects of Horizon 2020 (up to mid-2018): Some remarkable developments. Think Pieces (2). Pobrane z: https://www.peter-fisch.eu/eur....
 
16.
Fritsch, M., Titze, M., Piontek, M. (2020). Identifying cooperation for innovation-a comparison of data sources. Industry and Innovation, 27(6), 630-659. https://doi.org/10.1080/136627....
 
17.
Holme, P. (2005). Core-periphery organization of complex networks. Physical Review E, 72(4), 046111. https://doi.org/10.1103/physre....
 
18.
Katz, J.S., Martin, B.R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research policy, 26(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0048-....
 
19.
Kudic, M., Ehrenfeld, W., Pusch, T. (2015). On the trail of core–periphery patterns in innovation networks: measurements and new empirical findings from the German laser industry. The Annals of Regional Science, 55(1), 187-220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168....
 
20.
Reillon, V. (2017). EU framework programmes for research and innovation. Evolution and key data from FP1 to Horizon 2020 in View of FP9. European Parliament, Brussels. Pobrane z: https://www.europarl.europa.eu....
 
21.
Roediger-Schluga, T., Barber, M.J. (2008). R&D collaboration networks in the European Framework Programmes: Data processing, network construction and selected results. International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy, 4(3-4), 321-347. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijfip.....
 
22.
Scherngell, T., Lata, R. (2013). Towards an integrated European Research Area? Findings from Eigenvector spatially filtered spatial interaction models using European Framework Programme data. Papers in Regional Science, 92(3), 555-577. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435....
 
23.
Seidman, S.B. (1983). Network structure and minimum degree. Social networks, 5(3), 269-287. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8....
 
24.
Soh, P.H. (2003). The role of networking alliances in information acquisition and its implications for new product performance. Journal of business venturing, 18(6), 727-744. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0883-....
 
25.
Varga, A., Pontikakis, D., Chorafakis, G. (2014). Metropolitan Edison and cosmopolitan Pasteur? Agglomeration and interregional research network effects on European R&D productivity. Journal of Economic Geography, 14(2), 229-263. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lb....
 
26.
Wallerstein, I. (1991). Geopolitics and Geoculture: Essays on the Changing World-System. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
 
27.
Wanzenboeck, I., Scherngell, T., Brenner, T. (2014). Embeddedness of regions in European knowledge networks: a comparative analysis of inter-regional R&D collaborations, co-patents and co-publications. The Annals of Regional Science, 53, 337-368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168....
 
eISSN:2451-182X
ISSN:2083-3725
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top