PL EN
 
2/2022 vol. 15
Statystyki
CC-BY 4.0
Pobierz cytowanie
ARTYKUŁ ORYGINALNY
Różnice w definiowaniu zespołów wirtualnych i tradycyjnych
Yana Seliverstova 1
 
 
 
Więcej
Ukryj
1
Faculty of Economics and Business, Institute of Management and Organisation Sciences, The University of Debrecen, Hungary
 
 
Data nadesłania: 17-05-2022
 
 
Data akceptacji: 06-06-2022
 
 
Data publikacji online: 30-06-2022
 
 
Data publikacji: 30-06-2022
 
 
Autor do korespondencji
Yana Seliverstova   

Faculty of Economics and Business, Institute of Management and Organisation Sciences, The University of Debrecen, Böszörményi, 4032, Debrecen, Hungary
 
 
Economic and Regional Studies 2022;15(2):250-265
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ers-2022-0017
 
 
Artykuł (PDF)
Referencje (52)
 
SŁOWA KLUCZOWE
technologie informacyjne i komunikacyjne
zespół rozproszony
postęp technologiczny
praca zdalna
administracja
zarządzanie projektami globalnymi
 
DZIEDZINY
Rozwój międzynarodowy
Praca i kapitał ludzki
Badania i rozwój/Zmiany technologiczne/Nowe technologie
 
STRESZCZENIE
Przedmiot i cel pracy: Celem niniejszej pracy jest przegląd aktualnej literatury na temat zespołów wirtualnych, aby zgromadzić to, co jako środowisko naukowe wiemy na temat zespołów wirtualnych i zarządzania nimi. Materiały i metody: W niniejszym badaniu zastosowaliśmy systematyczny przegląd literatury w oparciu o bazę danych Scopus. Wyniki: W artykule przedstawiono holistyczną definicję zespołów wirtualnych oraz ich klasyfikację w oparciu o różne kryteria. Omówiono w nim także rodzaje zespołów wirtualnych oraz korzyści i wady takich zespołów. Przeanalizowano kluczowe cechy zarządzania zespołami wirtualnymi w odniesieniu do tradycyjnego zarządzania zespołami. Wnioski: W 2022 roku zespoły wirtualne są rozwiązaniem obiecującym i dynamicznie się rozwijającym, ponieważ technologie cyfrowe oraz obecna globalizacja i pandemia COVID-19 sprzyjają pracy zdalnej, a nawet ją wymuszają. Taka forma zatrudnienia jest korzystna i wygodna, ale jednocześnie wiąże się z pewnym ryzykiem i trudnościami, których można uniknąć przy właściwej organizacji procesu.
 
REFERENCJE (52)
1.
Adair, W.L., Buchan, N.R., Chen, X.-P., Liu, D. (2016). A model of communication context and measure of context dependence, Academy of Management Discoveries, 2(2), 198-217. https://doi.org/10.5465/amd.20....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
2.
Allen, T.D., Golden, T.D., Shockley, K.M. (2015). How Effective Is Telecommuting? Assessing the Status of Our Scientific Findings. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16(2), 40-68. https://doi.org/10.1177/152910....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
3.
Barnwell, D., Nedrick, S., Rudolph, E., Sesay, M., Wellen, W. (2014). Leadership of international and virtual project teams. International Journal of Global Business, 7(2), 1–8.
Google Scholar
 
 
4.
Bhalla, V., Dyrchs, S., Strack, R. (2017). Twelve Forces that will Radically Change How Organizations Work. The Boston Consulting Group. Downloaded from: https://www.bcg.com/publicatio....
Google Scholar
 
 
5.
Bourgault, M., Drouin, N., Hamel, É. (2008). Decision-making within distributed project teams: an exploration of formalization and autonomy as determinants of success. Paper presented at PMI® Research Conference: Defining the Future of Project Management, Warsaw, Poland. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
Google Scholar
 
 
6.
Breuer, C., Hüffmeier, J., Hertel, G. (2016). Does Trust Matter More in Virtual Teams? A Meta-Analysis of Trust and Team Effectiveness Considering Virtuality and Documentation as Moderators. The Journal of applied psychology. https://doi:10.1037/apl0000113.
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
7.
Build Remote (2021). Every Company Going Remote Permanently. Downloaded from: https://buildremote.co/compani... (accessed: 2021.20.03).
Google Scholar
 
 
8.
Bulinska-Stangrecka, H., Bagienska, A. (2021). The Role of Employee Relations in Shaping Job Satisfaction as an Element Promoting Positive Mental Health at Work in the Era of COVID-19. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18, 1903. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
9.
Castellano, S., Davidson, P., Khelladi, I. (2016). Creativity techniques to enhance knowledge transfer within global virtual teams in the context of knowledge-intensive enterprises. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(2), 253-266.
Google Scholar
 
 
10.
Duran, V., Popescu, A.-D. (2014). The challenge of multicultural communication in virtual teams. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 109, 365 – 369.
Google Scholar
 
 
11.
Fu, M., Kelly, J., Clinch, J. P., King, F. (2012). Environmental policy implications of working from home: Modelling the impacts of land-use, infrastructure and socio-demographics. Energy Policy. 47, 416–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpo....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
12.
Gheni, A.Y., Jusoh, Y.Y., Jabar, M.A., Ali, N.M., Abdullah, R.Hj., Abdullah S., Khalefa M.S. (2015). The Virtual Teams: E-leaders Challenges, IEEE Conference on e-Learning, e-Management and e-Services. Melaka. https://doi.org/10.1109/IC3e.2....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
13.
Gibson, C. B., Gibbs, J. L. (2006). Unpacking the Concept of Virtuality?: The Effects of Geographic Dispersion, Electronic Dependence, Dynamic Structure, and National Diversity on Team Innovation Author(s): Cristina B. Gibson and Jennifer L. Gibbs Published by: Sage Publications, 51(3), 451–495.
Google Scholar
 
 
14.
Gilson L.L., Maynard, M.T., Jones Young, N.C., Vartiainen, M., Hakonen M. (2014). Virtual teams research: 10 years, 10 themes, and 10 opportunities. Journal of Management, 41(5), 1313-1337. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
15.
Glikson, E., Erez, M. (2020). The emergence of a communication climate in global virtual teams. Journal of World Business, 55(6), ISSN 1090-9516,.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
16.
Global Workplace Analytics (2020). Downloaded from: https://globalworkplaceanalyti... (access: 2021.30.03).
Google Scholar
 
 
17.
Grenny, J., Maxfield, D. (2017). A study of 1100 employees found that remote workers feel shunned and left out. Harvard Business Review, Downloaded from: https://hbsp.harvard.edu/aece0... (accessed: 2021.15.04).
Google Scholar
 
 
18.
Grözinger, N. Irlenbusch, B., Laske, K., Schröder, M. (2020). Innovation and communication media in virtual teams – An experimental study. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 180, 201-218, ISSN 0167-2681, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
19.
Haas, M. R. (2006). Acquiring and applying knowledge in transnational teams: The roles of cosmopolitans and locals. Organization Science, 17(3), 367-384.
Google Scholar
 
 
20.
Henry, J.E., Hartzler, M. (1998). Tools for Virtual Teams: A Team Fitness Companion.
Google Scholar
 
 
21.
Hoch, J. E., Kozlowski, S. W. (2014). Leading virtual teams: Hierarchical leadership, structural supports, and shared team leadership. Journal Of Applied Psychology, 99(3), 390.
Google Scholar
 
 
22.
Dulebohn, J. H., Hoch, J. E. (2017). Virtual teams in organizations. Human Resource Management Review, 27(4), 569-574.
Google Scholar
 
 
23.
Jimenez, A., Boehe, D.M., Taras, V., Caprar, D.V. (2017). Working Across Boundaries: Current and Future Perspectives on Global Virtual Teams. Journal of International Management, 23(4), 341-349, ISSN 1075-4253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intm....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
24.
Khan, M. S., Khan, I., Din, S., Ismail, H.M, Khattak, R., Jan, R. (2015). The Impacts of ICT on the Students’ Performance: A Review of Access to Information. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences 5(1), 85-94.
Google Scholar
 
 
25.
Killingsworth, B., Xue, Y., Liu, Y. (2016). Factors influencing knowledge sharing among global virtual teams. Team Performance Management, 22(5/6), 284-300. https://doi.org/10.1108/TPM-10....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
26.
Klitmøller, A., Schneider, S.C., Jonsen, K. (2015). Speaking of global virtual teams: language differences, social categorization and media choice. Personnel Review, 44(2), 270-285. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-11-....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
27.
Krawczyk-Bryłka B. (2017). Comparative Study of Traditional and Virtual Teams. Task quarterly, 21(3), 233–245. https://doi.org/10.17466/tq201....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
28.
Manning, S., Larsen, M., Bharati, P. (2015). Global delivery models: The role of talent, speed and time zones in the global outsourcing industry. Journal of International Business Studies, 46(7): 850-877.
Google Scholar
 
 
29.
Martinsons, M., Davison, R. (2007). Strategic decision making and support systems: Comparing American, Japanese and Chinese management. Decision Support Systems, 43, 284-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
30.
Maynard M.T., Gilson L.L. (2014). The role of shared mental model development in understanding virtual team effectiveness, Group & Organization Management, 39(1), 3-32.
Google Scholar
 
 
31.
Nordbäck, E. S. Espinosa, J. A. (2019). Effective Coordination of Shared Leadership in Global Virtual Teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 36(1), 321-350. https://doi.org/10.1080/074212....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
32.
Nurmi, N., Hinds, P. (2016). Job complexity and learning opportunities: A silver lining in the design of global virtual work. Journal International Business Study, 47, 631–654. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
33.
Piccoli, G., Powell, A., Ives, B. (2004). Virtual teams: Team control structure, work processes, and team effectiveness. Information Technology & People, 17(4), 359–379. https://doi.org/10.1108/095938....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
34.
Plenkina V., Andronova I., Deberdieva E., Lenkova O., Osinovskaya, I. (2018). Specifics of strategic managerial decisions-making in Russian oil companies. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues 5(4): 858-874. http://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.20...).
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
35.
Presbitero A. (2020). Foreign language skill, anxiety, cultural intelligence and individual task performance in global virtual teams: A cognitive perspective. Journal of International Management, 26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intm....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
36.
Raghuram, S., Hill, N.S., Gibbs, J.L. & Maruping, L.M. (2018). Virtual Work: Bridging Research Clusters. Academy of Management Annals, 13. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
37.
Répáczki, R., Juhász, M. (2010). Spreading of project and virtual teams in traditional organizational cultures. Periodica Polytechnica Social and Management Sciences, 18(2), 87-98. https://doi.org/10.3311/pp.so.....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
38.
Shachaf, P. (2008). Cultural diversity and information and communication technology impacts on global virtual teams: An exploratory study. Information and Management, 45(2), 131‐142.
Google Scholar
 
 
39.
Shaik, F. F., Makhecha, U. P. (2019). Drivers of Employee Engagement in Global Virtual Teams. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 23. https://doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
40.
Srilalitha, S. (2015). 'Ringi System' The Decision Making Process in Japanese Management Systems: An Overview. International Journal of Management and Humanities, 1(7). ISSN: 2394-0913, Downloaded from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2597... (accessed: 2021.11.04).
Google Scholar
 
 
41.
Snellman C. L. (2014). Virtual teams: opportunities and challenges for e-leaders. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1251-1261.
Google Scholar
 
 
42.
Schmidt, J. B., Montoya-Weiss, M. M., Massey, A. P. (2001). New product development decision-making effectiveness: Comparing individuals, face-to-face teams, and virtual teams. Decision Sciences, 32(4), 575–600.
Google Scholar
 
 
43.
Smite, D., Kuhrmann, M., Keil, P. (2014) Virtual Teams [Guest editors' introduction]. IEEE Software, 31(6), 41-46. https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.201....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
44.
Tworoger, L. C., Ruppel, C. P., Gong, B., Pohlman, R. A. (2013). Leadership constraints: Leading global virtual teams through environmental complexity. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 9(2), 34–60.
Google Scholar
 
 
45.
Upwork. (2020). U.S. business hiring trends – Upwork future workforce report. Downloaded from: https://www.upwork.com/press/r... (accessed: 2021.11.04).
Google Scholar
 
 
46.
Webster, J., Wong, W.K.P. (2008). Comparing traditional and virtual group forms: identity, communication and trust in naturally occurring project teams. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(1), 41–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/095851....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
47.
Wei, L.H., Thurasamy, R. Popa S. (2018). Managing virtual teams for open innovation in Global Business Services industry. Management Decision, 56(6), 1285-1305, Emerald Publishing Limited, 0025-1747. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-08-....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
48.
Wildman, J.L., Griffith, R.L. (2015). Leading Global Teams Means Dealing with Different, Leading Global Teams: Translating Multidisciplinary Science to Practice, Springer, 13-32.
Google Scholar
 
 
49.
Williams, I.T. (1975). Decision-making process in Japan. Intereconomics 10, 247–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0292....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
50.
Zeuge, A., Oschinsky, F., Weigel, A., Schlechtinger, M., Niehaves, B. (2020). Leading Virtual Teams -A Literature Review.
Google Scholar
 
 
51.
Zimmermann A. (2011). Interpersonal relationships in transnational, virtual teams: Towards a configurational perspective. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13, 59–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
52.
Zuofa, T., & Ochieng, E.G. (2017). Working separately but together: appraising virtual project team challenges. Team Performance Management, 23(5/6), 227-242. https://doi.org/10.1108/TPM-06....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
Udostępnij
Wyślij mailem
ARTYKUŁ POWIĄZANY
PRACA ZDALNA W POLSCE I JEJ PERSPEKTYWY
Indeksy
 
Indeks słów kluczowych
Indeks dziedzin
Indeks autorów
eISSN:2451-182X
ISSN:2083-3725
Journals System - logo
„Zwiększenie udziału zagranicznych recenzentów w czasopiśmie Economic and Regional Studies/ Studia Ekonomiczne i Regionalne - zadanie finansowane w ramach umowy Nr 583/P-DUN/2017 ze środków Ministra Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę”.

„Digitalizacja czasopisma Economic and Regional Studies/ Studia Ekonomiczne i Regionalne – zadanie finansowane w ramach umowy Nr 819/P-DUN/2018 ze środków Ministra Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę”.

© 2006-2024 Journal hosting platform by Bentus
Scroll to top