PL EN
ARTYKUŁ ORYGINALNY
Różnice w definiowaniu zespołów wirtualnych i tradycyjnych
 
Więcej
Ukryj
1
Faculty of Economics and Business, Institute of Management and Organisation Sciences, The University of Debrecen, Hungary
AUTOR DO KORESPONDENCJI
Yana Seliverstova   

Faculty of Economics and Business, Institute of Management and Organisation Sciences, The University of Debrecen, Böszörményi, 4032, Debrecen, Hungary
Data nadesłania: 17-05-2022
Data akceptacji: 06-06-2022
Data publikacji online: 30-06-2022
Data publikacji: 30-06-2022
 
Economic and Regional Studies 2022;15(2):250–265
 
SŁOWA KLUCZOWE
DZIEDZINY
STRESZCZENIE
Przedmiot i cel pracy: Celem niniejszej pracy jest przegląd aktualnej literatury na temat zespołów wirtualnych, aby zgromadzić to, co jako środowisko naukowe wiemy na temat zespołów wirtualnych i zarządzania nimi. Materiały i metody: W niniejszym badaniu zastosowaliśmy systematyczny przegląd literatury w oparciu o bazę danych Scopus. Wyniki: W artykule przedstawiono holistyczną definicję zespołów wirtualnych oraz ich klasyfikację w oparciu o różne kryteria. Omówiono w nim także rodzaje zespołów wirtualnych oraz korzyści i wady takich zespołów. Przeanalizowano kluczowe cechy zarządzania zespołami wirtualnymi w odniesieniu do tradycyjnego zarządzania zespołami. Wnioski: W 2022 roku zespoły wirtualne są rozwiązaniem obiecującym i dynamicznie się rozwijającym, ponieważ technologie cyfrowe oraz obecna globalizacja i pandemia COVID-19 sprzyjają pracy zdalnej, a nawet ją wymuszają. Taka forma zatrudnienia jest korzystna i wygodna, ale jednocześnie wiąże się z pewnym ryzykiem i trudnościami, których można uniknąć przy właściwej organizacji procesu.
 
REFERENCJE (52)
1.
Adair, W.L., Buchan, N.R., Chen, X.-P., Liu, D. (2016). A model of communication context and measure of context dependence, Academy of Management Discoveries, 2(2), 198-217. https://doi.org/10.5465/amd.20....
 
2.
Allen, T.D., Golden, T.D., Shockley, K.M. (2015). How Effective Is Telecommuting? Assessing the Status of Our Scientific Findings. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16(2), 40-68. https://doi.org/10.1177/152910....
 
3.
Barnwell, D., Nedrick, S., Rudolph, E., Sesay, M., Wellen, W. (2014). Leadership of international and virtual project teams. International Journal of Global Business, 7(2), 1–8.
 
4.
Bhalla, V., Dyrchs, S., Strack, R. (2017). Twelve Forces that will Radically Change How Organizations Work. The Boston Consulting Group. Downloaded from: https://www.bcg.com/publicatio....
 
5.
Bourgault, M., Drouin, N., Hamel, É. (2008). Decision-making within distributed project teams: an exploration of formalization and autonomy as determinants of success. Paper presented at PMI® Research Conference: Defining the Future of Project Management, Warsaw, Poland. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
 
6.
Breuer, C., Hüffmeier, J., Hertel, G. (2016). Does Trust Matter More in Virtual Teams? A Meta-Analysis of Trust and Team Effectiveness Considering Virtuality and Documentation as Moderators. The Journal of applied psychology. https://doi:10.1037/apl0000113.
 
7.
Build Remote (2021). Every Company Going Remote Permanently. Downloaded from: https://buildremote.co/compani... (accessed: 2021.20.03).
 
8.
Bulinska-Stangrecka, H., Bagienska, A. (2021). The Role of Employee Relations in Shaping Job Satisfaction as an Element Promoting Positive Mental Health at Work in the Era of COVID-19. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18, 1903. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph....
 
9.
Castellano, S., Davidson, P., Khelladi, I. (2016). Creativity techniques to enhance knowledge transfer within global virtual teams in the context of knowledge-intensive enterprises. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(2), 253-266.
 
10.
Duran, V., Popescu, A.-D. (2014). The challenge of multicultural communication in virtual teams. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 109, 365 – 369.
 
11.
Fu, M., Kelly, J., Clinch, J. P., King, F. (2012). Environmental policy implications of working from home: Modelling the impacts of land-use, infrastructure and socio-demographics. Energy Policy. 47, 416–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpo....
 
12.
Gheni, A.Y., Jusoh, Y.Y., Jabar, M.A., Ali, N.M., Abdullah, R.Hj., Abdullah S., Khalefa M.S. (2015). The Virtual Teams: E-leaders Challenges, IEEE Conference on e-Learning, e-Management and e-Services. Melaka. https://doi.org/10.1109/IC3e.2....
 
13.
Gibson, C. B., Gibbs, J. L. (2006). Unpacking the Concept of Virtuality?: The Effects of Geographic Dispersion, Electronic Dependence, Dynamic Structure, and National Diversity on Team Innovation Author(s): Cristina B. Gibson and Jennifer L. Gibbs Published by: Sage Publications, 51(3), 451–495.
 
14.
Gilson L.L., Maynard, M.T., Jones Young, N.C., Vartiainen, M., Hakonen M. (2014). Virtual teams research: 10 years, 10 themes, and 10 opportunities. Journal of Management, 41(5), 1313-1337. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920....
 
15.
Glikson, E., Erez, M. (2020). The emergence of a communication climate in global virtual teams. Journal of World Business, 55(6), ISSN 1090-9516,.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.....
 
16.
Global Workplace Analytics (2020). Downloaded from: https://globalworkplaceanalyti... (access: 2021.30.03).
 
17.
Grenny, J., Maxfield, D. (2017). A study of 1100 employees found that remote workers feel shunned and left out. Harvard Business Review, Downloaded from: https://hbsp.harvard.edu/aece0... (accessed: 2021.15.04).
 
18.
Grözinger, N. Irlenbusch, B., Laske, K., Schröder, M. (2020). Innovation and communication media in virtual teams – An experimental study. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 180, 201-218, ISSN 0167-2681, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo....
 
19.
Haas, M. R. (2006). Acquiring and applying knowledge in transnational teams: The roles of cosmopolitans and locals. Organization Science, 17(3), 367-384.
 
20.
Henry, J.E., Hartzler, M. (1998). Tools for Virtual Teams: A Team Fitness Companion.
 
21.
Hoch, J. E., Kozlowski, S. W. (2014). Leading virtual teams: Hierarchical leadership, structural supports, and shared team leadership. Journal Of Applied Psychology, 99(3), 390.
 
22.
Dulebohn, J. H., Hoch, J. E. (2017). Virtual teams in organizations. Human Resource Management Review, 27(4), 569-574.
 
23.
Jimenez, A., Boehe, D.M., Taras, V., Caprar, D.V. (2017). Working Across Boundaries: Current and Future Perspectives on Global Virtual Teams. Journal of International Management, 23(4), 341-349, ISSN 1075-4253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intm....
 
24.
Khan, M. S., Khan, I., Din, S., Ismail, H.M, Khattak, R., Jan, R. (2015). The Impacts of ICT on the Students’ Performance: A Review of Access to Information. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences 5(1), 85-94.
 
25.
Killingsworth, B., Xue, Y., Liu, Y. (2016). Factors influencing knowledge sharing among global virtual teams. Team Performance Management, 22(5/6), 284-300. https://doi.org/10.1108/TPM-10....
 
26.
Klitmøller, A., Schneider, S.C., Jonsen, K. (2015). Speaking of global virtual teams: language differences, social categorization and media choice. Personnel Review, 44(2), 270-285. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-11-....
 
27.
Krawczyk-Bryłka B. (2017). Comparative Study of Traditional and Virtual Teams. Task quarterly, 21(3), 233–245. https://doi.org/10.17466/tq201....
 
28.
Manning, S., Larsen, M., Bharati, P. (2015). Global delivery models: The role of talent, speed and time zones in the global outsourcing industry. Journal of International Business Studies, 46(7): 850-877.
 
29.
Martinsons, M., Davison, R. (2007). Strategic decision making and support systems: Comparing American, Japanese and Chinese management. Decision Support Systems, 43, 284-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.....
 
30.
Maynard M.T., Gilson L.L. (2014). The role of shared mental model development in understanding virtual team effectiveness, Group & Organization Management, 39(1), 3-32.
 
31.
Nordbäck, E. S. Espinosa, J. A. (2019). Effective Coordination of Shared Leadership in Global Virtual Teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 36(1), 321-350. https://doi.org/10.1080/074212....
 
32.
Nurmi, N., Hinds, P. (2016). Job complexity and learning opportunities: A silver lining in the design of global virtual work. Journal International Business Study, 47, 631–654. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2....
 
33.
Piccoli, G., Powell, A., Ives, B. (2004). Virtual teams: Team control structure, work processes, and team effectiveness. Information Technology & People, 17(4), 359–379. https://doi.org/10.1108/095938....
 
34.
Plenkina V., Andronova I., Deberdieva E., Lenkova O., Osinovskaya, I. (2018). Specifics of strategic managerial decisions-making in Russian oil companies. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues 5(4): 858-874. http://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.20....
 
35.
Presbitero A. (2020). Foreign language skill, anxiety, cultural intelligence and individual task performance in global virtual teams: A cognitive perspective. Journal of International Management, 26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intm....
 
36.
Raghuram, S., Hill, N.S., Gibbs, J.L. & Maruping, L.M. (2018). Virtual Work: Bridging Research Clusters. Academy of Management Annals, 13. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals....
 
37.
Répáczki, R., Juhász, M. (2010). Spreading of project and virtual teams in traditional organizational cultures. Periodica Polytechnica Social and Management Sciences, 18(2), 87-98. https://doi.org/10.3311/pp.so.....
 
38.
Shachaf, P. (2008). Cultural diversity and information and communication technology impacts on global virtual teams: An exploratory study. Information and Management, 45(2), 131‐142.
 
39.
Shaik, F. F., Makhecha, U. P. (2019). Drivers of Employee Engagement in Global Virtual Teams. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 23. https://doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v....
 
40.
Srilalitha, S. (2015). 'Ringi System' The Decision Making Process in Japanese Management Systems: An Overview. International Journal of Management and Humanities, 1(7). ISSN: 2394-0913, Downloaded from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2597... (accessed: 2021.11.04).
 
41.
Snellman C. L. (2014). Virtual teams: opportunities and challenges for e-leaders. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1251-1261.
 
42.
Schmidt, J. B., Montoya-Weiss, M. M., Massey, A. P. (2001). New product development decision-making effectiveness: Comparing individuals, face-to-face teams, and virtual teams. Decision Sciences, 32(4), 575–600.
 
43.
Smite, D., Kuhrmann, M., Keil, P. (2014) Virtual Teams [Guest editors' introduction]. IEEE Software, 31(6), 41-46. https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.201....
 
44.
Tworoger, L. C., Ruppel, C. P., Gong, B., Pohlman, R. A. (2013). Leadership constraints: Leading global virtual teams through environmental complexity. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 9(2), 34–60.
 
45.
Upwork. (2020). U.S. business hiring trends – Upwork future workforce report. Downloaded from: https://www.upwork.com/press/r... (accessed: 2021.11.04).
 
46.
Webster, J., Wong, W.K.P. (2008). Comparing traditional and virtual group forms: identity, communication and trust in naturally occurring project teams. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(1), 41–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/095851....
 
47.
Wei, L.H., Thurasamy, R. Popa S. (2018). Managing virtual teams for open innovation in Global Business Services industry. Management Decision, 56(6), 1285-1305, Emerald Publishing Limited, 0025-1747. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-08-....
 
48.
Wildman, J.L., Griffith, R.L. (2015). Leading Global Teams Means Dealing with Different, Leading Global Teams: Translating Multidisciplinary Science to Practice, Springer, 13-32.
 
49.
Williams, I.T. (1975). Decision-making process in Japan. Intereconomics 10, 247–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0292....
 
50.
Zeuge, A., Oschinsky, F., Weigel, A., Schlechtinger, M., Niehaves, B. (2020). Leading Virtual Teams -A Literature Review.
 
51.
Zimmermann A. (2011). Interpersonal relationships in transnational, virtual teams: Towards a configurational perspective. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13, 59–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468....
 
52.
Zuofa, T., & Ochieng, E.G. (2017). Working separately but together: appraising virtual project team challenges. Team Performance Management, 23(5/6), 227-242. https://doi.org/10.1108/TPM-06....
 
eISSN:2451-182X
ISSN:2083-3725