REVIEW ARTICLE
CULTURE SECURITY - SELECTED ISSUES
			
	
 
More details
Hide details
	
	
									
				1
				Collegium Civitas University, Cultural Security Department
Collegium Civitas, Pracownia Bezpieczeństwa Kulturowego
				 
			 
										
				
				
		
		 
			
			
		
		
		
		
		
			
			 
			Publication date: 2018-07-04
			 
		 			
		 
	
							
					    		
    			 
    			
    				    					Corresponding author
    					    				    				
    					Magdalena  El Ghamari   
    					dr Magdalena El Ghamari, Collegium Civitas, Pracownia Bezpieczeństwa Kulturowego, plac
Defilad 1, XII piętro, 00-901 Warszawa, Polska; tel. +48 22 65 67 18; ORCID 0000-0001-5798-7545
    				
 
    			
				 
    			 
    		 		
			
							 
		
	 
		
 
 
Economic and Regional Studies 2017;10(4):96-109
		
 
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Subject and purpose of work: The main goal is to offer more productive approach to security culture: viewing culture as a logical system which can be understood using theories and principles developed. Materials and methods: Cultural security issue collaborative research and discovery of literature to fully exploit social networks and open source material. Results: Cultural security issue analyzes the hard and soft power of antiquities, artworks, religious monuments, and historic structures as indicators of the political economy of cultural property. Conclusions: Analyses of the political significance of historic structures and religious monuments and the licit and illicit global market for antiquities and artworks provide insights into the strategic role of cultural property in diplomacy and international security. Integrating operational cultural principles into the specific conditions is the future and will bring depth to touchstones such as “no better friend, no worse enemy,” and “first, do no harm”.
		
	
		
REFERENCES (11)
			
	1.
	
		Barnard A. (2000), History and Theory in Anthropology. University Press, Cambridge.
		
	 
	 
 			
	2.
	
		Bainbridge W. S., Stark R. (2007), Teoria religii. Nomos, Kraków.
		
	 
	 
 			
	3.
	
		Erickson P.A. , Murphy L.D. (2003), A History of Anthropological Theory. Broadview Press, Ney York.
		
	 
	 
 			
	4.
	
		Dobbelaere K. (2008), Sekularyzacja: trzy poziomy analizy. Nomos, Kraków.
		
	 
	 
 			
	5.
	
		Durkheim É. (1990), Elementarne formy życia religijnego. PWN, Warszawa.
		
	 
	 
 			
	6.
	
		Iannaccone L. (1996), Rational Chioce: Framework for the Scientific Study of Religion, W: L. Young (red.), Rational Chioce Theory and Religion: Summary and Assessment. University Press, London, s. 10-32.
		
	 
	 
 			
	7.
	
		Hofstede G. (1994), National Cultures Revisited. An Essay on Man. University Press, Yale, New Haven.
		
	 
	 
 			
	8.
	
		Moore J.D. (2004), Visions of Culture: An Introduction to Anthropological Theories and Theorists. Alta Mira Press.
		
	 
	 
 			
	9.
	
		Monaghan J., Just P. (2000), Social and Cultural Anthropology: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
		
	 
	 
 			
	10.
	
		McGuire M. B. (2012), Religia w kontekście społecznym. Nomos, Kraków.
		
	 
	 
 			
	11.
	
		Salzman P.C. (2001), Understanding Culture: An Introduction to Anthropological Theory. Long Grove, Waveland Press, IL.