PL EN
 
3/2022 vol. 15
Statystyki
CC-BY 4.0
Pobierz cytowanie
ARTYKUŁ PRZEGLĄDOWY
Zielony rozwój gospodarczy jako koncepcja wyznaczająca ramy zielonego finansowania i zielonych inwestycji
,
 
,
 
 
 
 
Więcej
Ukryj
1
Postgraduate and Research Division, Instituto Tecnológico José Mario Molina Pasquel y Henríquez, Mexico
2
Instytut Ekonomii i Finansów, SZKOŁA GŁÓWNA GOSPODARSTWA WIEJSKIEGO w WARSZAWIE, Polska
3
Campus Cd. Guzmán, Instituto Tecnológico de México, Mexico
AUTOR DO KORESPONDENCJI
Joanna Rakowska   

Instytut Ekonomii i Finansów, SZKOŁA GŁÓWNA GOSPODARSTWA WIEJSKIEGO w WARSZAWIE, Polska
Data nadesłania: 19-07-2022
Data ostatniej rewizji: 31-08-2022
Data akceptacji: 06-09-2022
Data publikacji online: 28-09-2022
Data publikacji: 28-09-2022
 
Economic and Regional Studies 2022;15(3):303–321
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ers-2022-0021
 
 
Artykuł (PDF)
Referencje (118)
 
SŁOWA KLUCZOWE
zielone inwestycje
zielony rozwój gospodarczy
zielone fundusze
teoria rozwoju
 
DZIEDZINY
Ekonomia i polityka środowiskowa
 
STRESZCZENIE
Przedmiot i cel pracy: Niniejsze opracowanie ma na celu analizę głównych elementów zielonego rozwoju gospodarczego, który wyznacza ramy zielonego finansowania i zielonych inwestycji. U podstaw tej analizy leży przekonanie, że zielona ekonomia sama z siebie tworzy ramy normatywne i stanowi szkołę myślenia czerpiącą z neoklasycznego myślenia o gospodarce, a także – z własnymi założeniami pojęciowymi, brakami i sprzecznościami – zaczyna wypracowywać genezę, cele i zasady filozoficzne. Materiały i metody: Zastosowano metody analityczne i opisowe oparte na krytycznym przeglądzie literatury oraz empirycznej refleksji dotyczących kluczowych aspektów i zmiennych zielonego rozwoju gospodarczego, zielonego finansowania i zielonych inwestycji. Wyniki: Wykazano, że wdrażanie działań w zakresie zielonej gospodarki napotyka na wiele przeszkód. Najistotniejsze z nich to niewystarczające finansowanie i wsparcie instytucjonalne we współpracy i praktykach koordynacyjnych.
 
REFERENCJE (118)
1.
Adamowicz, M., (2022). A green concept of economic growth and development. Economic and Regional Studies, 15(2), 158 – 180. https://doi.org/10.2478/ers-20... (p. 159).
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
2.
African Development Bank (AfDB). (2014). Green growth Sierra Leone: investing in environmentally sound economic growth. African Development Bank, Tunis (www.afdb.org/fileadmin/uploads/afdb/Documents/ Project-and-Operations/Sierra_Leone_ _Investing_in_Environmentally_Sound_Economic_Growth.pdf) Accessed 27 June 2016.
Google Scholar
 
 
3.
Al Mheiri, W., Nobanee, H. (2020). Green Bonds: A Mini-Review. Available at SSRN 3538790.
Google Scholar
 
 
4.
Alemzero, D.A., Iqbal, N., Iqbal, S., Mohsin, M., Chukwuma, N.J., Shah, B.A. (2021). Assessing the perceived impact of exploration and production of hydrocarbons on households’ perspective of environmental regulation in Ghana. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(5):5359–5371.
Google Scholar
 
 
5.
Allen, C. (2012). A Guidebook to the Green Economy, Issue 3: Exploring Green Economy Policies and International Experience with National Strategies. UN Division for Sustainable Development.
Google Scholar
 
 
6.
Al–Sheryani, K., Nobanee, H. (2020). Green Finance: A Mini–Review, SSRN Electronic Journal, 10.2139/ ssrn.3538696.
Google Scholar
 
 
7.
Atanasova, N., Castellar, J.A.C., Pineda-Martos, R., Nika, C.E., Katsou, E., Isteniˇc, D., Pucher, B., Andreucci, M.B., Langergraber, G., (2021). Nature-based solutions and circularity in cities. Circ. Econ. Sustain. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s43615-021- 00024-1.
Google Scholar
 
 
8.
Barbier, E. B. (2013). The green economy post Rio+20. Science 33887–8.
Google Scholar
 
 
9.
Barbier, E. B. (2021). Habitat loss and the risk of disease outbreak, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 108, 102451, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
10.
Barbier, E.B. (2012). The Green Economy Post Rio+20. Science 2012, 338, 887–888.
Google Scholar
 
 
11.
Barnett, M., Darnall, N., Husted, B. (2015). Sustainability Strategy in Constrained Economic Times. Long Range Plan, 48, 63–68.
Google Scholar
 
 
12.
Baron, R. M., Kenny, D. A. (1986). The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 51(6), 1173–1182. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.117.
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
13.
Batyk, I.M., Farelnik, E., Rakowska, J., Maciejczak, M. (2022). Polish Cittaslow Local Governments’ Support for Renewable Energy Deployment vs. Slow City Concept. Energies, 15(201). https://doi.org/10.3390/ en15010201.
Google Scholar
 
 
14.
Beaudry, C., Schiffauerova, A. (2009). Who’s Right, Marshall or Jacobs? The Localization versus Urbanization Debate. Res. Pol. 38(2), 318–337. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.11.010.
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
15.
Bina, O., La Camera, F. (2011). Promise and shortcomings of a green turn in recent policy responses to the ‘double crisis’. Ecological Economics 70, 2308–16.
Google Scholar
 
 
16.
Bloomberg New Energy Finance (BNEF) (2016b). New energy outlook 2016. London and New York.
Google Scholar
 
 
17.
Bloomberg New Energy Finance (BNEF). (2016a) Clean energy investment in 2016 undershoots last year’s record Bloomberg, London and New York.
Google Scholar
 
 
18.
Borel-Saladin, J. M., Turok, I. N. (2013). The green economy: incremental change or transformation? Environmental Policyand Governance 23, 209–20.
Google Scholar
 
 
19.
Brand, U., (2012). Green economy – The next oxymoron? GAIA - Ecol. Perspect. Sci. Soc. 21, 28–32. https:// doi.org/10.14512/gaia.21.1.9.
Google Scholar
 
 
20.
Brodunov, A. N., Ya, V. (2015). Ushakov, Justification of financial decisions in conditions of uncertainty, Bulletin of the Witte Moscow University. Series 1: Economics and management (12), 30–36.
Google Scholar
 
 
21.
Buchmann-Duck, J., Beazley, K.F., 2020. An urgent call for circular economy advocates to acknowledge its limitations in conserving biodiversity. Sci. Total Environ. 127, 138602 https://doi.org/10.1016/j. scitotenv.2020.138602.
Google Scholar
 
 
22.
Bugge, M.M., Hansen, T., Klitkou, A., (2016). What is the bioeconomy? A review of the literature. Sustainability 8, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8070....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
23.
Bunevich, K. G., Petrov, D. M. (2013). Development of dual–use technologies based on the cluster approach, Bulletin of the Witte Moscow University. Economics and management 1(3), 75–79 (2013).
Google Scholar
 
 
24.
Burkaltseva, D. D., Blazhevich, O. G., Gabrielyan, O. A., Savchenko, L.V., Skorobogatova, T.N., Guk, O.A., Vobk, E.V., Abubakarov, M.A. (2019). Development of the financial security of the state: neutralization of threats, Rev. Incl. 6, 294–312.
Google Scholar
 
 
25.
Burkaltseva, D. D., Borsch, L. M., Gerasimova, S. V., Zotova, S. A. Guk, O. A. (2018). Regional aspect: laying.institutional groundworks, In: European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Science 50(33), 263–271.
Google Scholar
 
 
26.
Capasso, M., Hansen, T., Heiberg, J., Klitkou, A., Steen, M. (2019). Green growth – A synthesis of scientific findings. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146, 390–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. techfore.2019.06.013.
Google Scholar
 
 
27.
Chakravarty, S. R., Pal, R. (2013). Financial Inclusion in India: An Axiomatic Approach. J. Pol. Model. 35(5), 813–837. doi:10.1016/j.jpolmod.2012.12.007.
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
28.
Charmaz, K. (2009). Teoria Ugruntowana. Praktyczny Przewodnik po Analizie Jakościowej; Wydawnictwo PWN: Warsaw, Poland, 2009.
Google Scholar
 
 
29.
Cortellini, G., Panetta, I. C. (2021). Green Bond: A Systematic Literature Review for Future Research Agendas. Journal of Risk and Financial Management 14 pp. 589. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
30.
Cuong, T.T., Sang, L.X., Anh, N.K. (2008). Vietnam’ Small and Medium Sized Enterprises Development: Characteristics, Constraints and Policy Recommendations. In: Lim, H., Ed., SME in Asia, and Globalization, ERIA Research Project Report 2007-5.
Google Scholar
 
 
31.
Davies, A., Mullin, R., Sue, J. (2010). Greening the economy: interrogating sustainability innovations beyond the mainstream, 11(5), pp. 793, doi:10.1093/jeg/lbq050.
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
32.
Demirel, P., Parris, S. (2015). Access to finance for innovators in the UK’s environmental sector. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 27(7), 782–808. https://doi. org/10.1080/09537325.2015.1019849.
Google Scholar
 
 
33.
Ding, Y., Hu, Y. (2021). Inflection Point of Green Total Factor Productivity by Low-Carbon Regulation from Chinese Economics Recovery. Sustainability, 13(12382). https://doi.org/10.3390/ su132212382.
Google Scholar
 
 
34.
Drozdowski, G. (2021). Economic Calculus Qua an Instrument to Support Sustainable Development under Increasing Risk. J. Risk Financ. Manag. 14(15).
Google Scholar
 
 
35.
Egorova, M., Pluzhnic, M., Glik, P., (2015). Global Trends of «Green» Economy Development as a Factor for Improvement of Economical and Social Prosperity, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 166, 194- 198, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbsp... S1877042814066476).
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
36.
European Commission. (2020). Europe 2020: a strategy for smart, sustainable, and inclusive growth, Brussels (http://ec.europa.eu/europe2020... 24 June 2016.
Google Scholar
 
 
37.
EY Romania. (2021). EY Attractiveness Survey Romania. Available online: https://assets.ey.com/content/ dam/ey-sites/ey-com/ro_ ro/news/2021/ey_attractiveness_survey_en.pdf (accessed on 8 October 2021).
Google Scholar
 
 
38.
Feng, C., Wang, M., Liu, G.-C., Huang, J.-B. (2017). Green Development Performance and its Influencing Factors: A Global Perspective. J. Clean. Prod. 144(2), 323–333. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.005.
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
39.
Florea, N.V., Duică, M.C., Ionescu, C.A., Duică, A., Ibinceanu, M.C.O., Stanescu, S.G. (2021). An Analysis of the Influencing Factors of the Romanian Agricultural Output within the Context of Green Economy. Sustainability, 13(9649).
Google Scholar
 
 
40.
Glaser, B.G.; Strauss, A.L. (2009). Odkrywanie Teorii Ugruntowanej. Strategie Badania Jakościowego; Nomos: Cracov, Poland.
Google Scholar
 
 
41.
Gu, H., Yan, W., Elahi, E., Cao, Y. (2020). Air Pollution Risks Human Mental Health: An Implication of Two- -Stages Least Squares Estimation of Interaction Effects. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 27(2):2036-2043. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-06612-x. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
42.
Gupta, J., Wong, K. Y. (2014) China’s evolving development dilemma in the context of the North–South climate governance debate. Perspectives on Global Development and Technology 13, 699–727.
Google Scholar
 
 
43.
Hai, N.N., Huy, N.T., Hien, P.M. (2013). Conditions for Green Economy in Vietnam. Workshop Proceeding Green Economy Development based on Interlectual Property Exploitation: Problems Raised, Foreign Trade University, Hanoi, December 2013.
Google Scholar
 
 
44.
Hamdouch, A., Depret, M. H. (2012). Sustainable Development Policies and the Geographical Landscape of the green economy: Actors, Scales and Strategies. Finisterra 47(94), 49–80. doi:10.18055/Finis2681.
CrossRef
 
WWW
 
Google Scholar
 
 
45.
Hansen, B. E. (1999). Threshold Effects in Non-dynamic Panels: Estimation, Testing, and Inference. J. Econom. 93(2), 345–368. doi:10.1016/s0304-4076(99)00025-1.
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
46.
Hansjürgens, B., 2004. Economic valuation through cost-benefit analysis - possibilities and limitations. Toxicology 205, 241–252.
Google Scholar
 
 
47.
Hao, D.H. (2014) Industrial Suggestion for Environmental and Economical Protection. http://cantho.gov.vn/ wps/wcm/connect/sotnmt/sub+site/sitemenu/linhvucquanly/linh+vuc+khoa+hoc+cong+nghe/cong +ng he+xanhloi+giai+cho+bai+toan+bao+ve+moi+truong+va+kinh+te.
Google Scholar
 
 
48.
Henderson, H. (2007). Growing the green economy – globally, Int. J. Green Economics, 1(3/4), pp.276–298.
Google Scholar
 
 
49.
Hille, E., Shahbaz, M., Moosa, I. (2019). The Impact of FDI on Regional Air Pollution in the Republic of Korea: A Way Ahead to Achieve the green Growth Strategy? Energ. Econ. 81, 308–326. doi:10.1016/j. eneco.2019.04.004.
Google Scholar
 
 
50.
Jänicke, M., (2012), ‘Green growth’: from a growing eco-industry to economic sustainability Energy Policy 48, 13–21.
Google Scholar
 
 
51.
Jiang, S., Zhou, X. (2021). Research on the Influence of Digital Inclusive Finance on High-Quality Economic Development. Financ. Forum 26(08), 39–49.
Google Scholar
 
 
52.
John, H., Marrs, C., Neubert, M., Alberico, S., Bovo, G. (2019). Green infrastructure handbook. Conceptual & Theoretical Background, Terms and Definitions. Technical report DO - 10.13140/RG.2.2.23323.54563.
Google Scholar
 
 
53.
Kay, J., Silberston, A. (1991). Green Economics. National Institute Economic Review, 135, 50-64. doi:10.1177/002795019113500104.
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
54.
Khan, J., Johansson, B., Hildingsson, R. (2021). Strategies for greening the economy in three Nordic countries. Environmental Policy and Governance, 31(6), 592–604. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.19....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
55.
Korhonen, J., Nuur, C., Feldmann, A., Birkie, S.E., (2018b). Circular economy as a contested concept. J. Clean. Prod. 175, 544–552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
56.
Li, M., Zhang, Y., Fan, Z., Chen, H. (2021). Evaluation and Research on the Level of Inclusive Green Growth in Asia-Pacific Region. Sustainability, 13(7482). https://doi.org/ 10.3390/su13137482.
Google Scholar
 
 
57.
Licastro, A., Sergi, B.S. (2021). Drivers and Barriers to a Green Economy. A Review of Selected Balkan Countries.Clean. Eng. Technol., 4, 100228.
Google Scholar
 
 
58.
Liu, N., Liu, C., Xia, Y., Ren, Y., Liang, J. (2020). Examining the Coordination between Green Finance and Green Economy aiming for Sustainable Development: A Case Study of China. Sustainability 12(9), 3717. doi:10.3390/su12093717.
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
59.
Lockwood, M. (2015). The Political Dynamics of Green Transformations: Feedback Effects and Institutional Context. In The Politics of Green Transformations, pp. 86–101. Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge.
Google Scholar
 
 
60.
Lombardi, D.R., Laybourn, P., (2012). Redifining industrial symbiosis. Crossing academic practitioner boundaries. J. Ind. Ecol. 16, 28–37,.
Google Scholar
 
 
61.
Martawardaya, B., Rakatama, A., Junifta, D. Y., Maharani, D. A. (2021). Green economy post COVID-19: insights from Indonesia, Development in Practice, doi: 10.1080/09614524.2021.2002817.
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
62.
Merino-Saum, A., Clement, J., Wyss, R., Baldi, M.G., (2020). Unpacking the green economy concept: a quantitative analysis of 140 definitions. J. Clean. Prod., 118339, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
Google Scholar
 
 
63.
Mihai, F., Aleca, O.E., Gogu, E., Dobrin, C., Gheorghe, M. (2021). The Challenges of the Green Economy in Romania. Scientific Literature Review. Sustainability, 13(13113). https://doi.org/10.3390/ su132313113.
Google Scholar
 
 
64.
Mol A P J, Sonnenfeld D A, Spaargaren G, (2009). The Ecological Modernisation Reader: Environmental Reform in Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.
Google Scholar
 
 
65.
Müller, F., Burkhard, B., (2012). The indicator side of ecosystem services. Ecosyst. Serv. 1, 26–30. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.06.001.
Google Scholar
 
 
66.
National Regional Development Strategy of the Republic of Bulgaria 2012-2022. (2012) https://www.mrrb. bg/bg/national-regional-development-strategy-of-therepublic-of-bulgaria-2012-2022/.
Google Scholar
 
 
67.
Nguyen, H. (2014). Doanh nghiệp nhỏ và vừa Việt Nam: Tăng sức mạnh “bó đũa”. http://www.vietnamplus. vn/doanh-nghiep-nho-va-vua-viet-nam-tang-suc-manh-bo-dua/260411.vnp.
Google Scholar
 
 
68.
Nguyen, T.H., Gomi, K., Matsuoka, Y., Tran, T.T., Fujino, J., Kainuma, M., Shreshta, R.M. (2010). Preliminary Study on Sustainable Low-Carbon Development towards 2030 in Vietnam. Asia-Pacific Integrated Model Team, GCOE on Human Security Engineering for Asian Megacities-Kyoto University in Corporation with National Institute for Environmental Studies.
Google Scholar
 
 
69.
Ni, Y., Chen, B., Wang, Y. (2020). Financial Development, Environmental Regulation and Green Total Factor Productivity: An Empirical Analysis.
Google Scholar
 
 
70.
Ning, Q. Q., Guo, S. L., Chang, X. Ch. (2021) Nexus between green financing, economic risk, political risk and environment: evidence from China, Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja. doi: 10.1080/1331677X. 2021.2012710.
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
71.
Ning, Y., Cherian, J., Sial, M.S., Álvarez-Otero, S., Comite, U., Zia-Ud-Din, M. (2022). Green bond as a new determinant of sustainable green financing, energy efficiency investment, and economic growth: a global perspective. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
72.
Niyazbekova, S., Jazykbayeva, B., Mottaevgreen, A., Beloussova, E., Suleimenova, B., Zueva, A. (2021). The Growth of “Green” finance at the global level in the context of sustainable economic development. E3S Web of Conferences 244(10058). https://doi.org/10.1051/e3scon....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
73.
O’Sullivan, M. (2005). The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
 
 
74.
OECD, (2011). Towards Green Growth. https://www.oecdilibrary.org/e... _9789264111318-en.
Google Scholar
 
 
75.
OECD, (2011). Towards Green Growth: Monitoring Progress; OECD Publishing: Paris, France.
Google Scholar
 
 
76.
Oh, D.-h. (2010). A Global Malmquist-Luenberger Productivity Index. J. Prod. Anal. 34(3), 183–197. doi:10.1007/s11123-010-0178-y.
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
77.
Ojo Fafore, E., Aigbavboa, C., Thwala, W., Ramaru, P. (2019). Green Finance for Sustainable Global Growth. doi:10.4018/978–1–5225–7808–6.ch010.
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
78.
Okuda, H., Aiba, D. (2016). Determinants of Operational Efficiency and Total Factor Productivity Change of Major Cambodian Financial Institutions: A Data Envelopment Analysis During 2006-13. Emerging Markets Finance Trade 52(6), 1455–1471, doi:10.1080/1540496x.2015.1105630.
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
79.
Onat, N., Bayar, H. (2010). The sustainability indicators of power production systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 14. 3108-3115. 10.1016/j.rser.2010.07.022.
Google Scholar
 
 
80.
Ozili, P. K. (2018). Impact of Digital Finance on Financial Inclusion and Stability. Borsa Istanbul Rev. 18(4), 329–340. doi:10.1016/j.bir.2017.12.003.
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
81.
Pai, M.K. (2016). The Technical Progress and Resilience in Productivity Growth of Korea’s Growth-Leading Industries. Asian Econ. Pap. 15(2), 167–191.doi:10.1162/asep_a_00441.
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
82.
Pan, W., Pan, W., Hu, C., Tu, H., Zhao, C., Yu, D., Xiong, J., Zheng, G. (2019). Assessing the Green Economy in China: An Improved Framework. J. Clean. Prod. 209, 680–691. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.267.
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
83.
Pizzol, M., C.R. Smart, J., Thomsen, M. (2014). External costs of cadmium emissions to soil: a drawback of phosphorus fertilizers. Journal of Cleaner Production 84, 475-483.
Google Scholar
 
 
84.
Rakowska, J.; Ozimek, I. Renewable Energy Attitudes and Behaviour of Local Governments in Poland. Energies, 14(2765). https://doi.org/10.3390/en1410....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
85.
Ren, X., Cheng, C., Wang, Z., Yan, C. (2021). Spillover and dynamic effects of energy transition and economic growth on carbon dioxide emissions for the European Union: A dynamic spatial panel model. Sustain. Dev., 29, 228–242.
Google Scholar
 
 
86.
Ren, X., Lu, Z., Cheng, C., Shi, Y., Shen, J. (2019). On dynamic linkages of the state natural gas markets in the USA: Evidence from an empirical spatio-temporal network quantile analysis. Energy Econ., 80, 234–252.
Google Scholar
 
 
87.
Ribokene, E. V. (2018). Assessment of the current state of small and medium–sized enterprises in the software development industry, Bulletin of Moscow University. S.Yu. Witte. Series 1: Economics and Management 1(24), 71–80. doi: 10.21777 / 2587–9472–2018–1–71–80.
Google Scholar
 
 
88.
Robins, N., et al. (2010) Green Austerity Hits the UK. London: HSBC Global Research, Climate Change.
Google Scholar
 
 
89.
Rudenko, L. G. (2017). Assessment of the possibility of sustainable environmental, social, and economic development of Russia, Bulletin of Moscow University. S. Yu. Witte. Economics and Management 1(20), 20–27. doi: 10.21777 / 2307–6135–2017–1–20–27.
Google Scholar
 
 
90.
Russo, A., Mariani, M., Caragnano, A. (2021). Exploring the determinants of green bond issuance: going beyond the long-lasting debate on performance consequences. Bus Strateg Environ 30(1), 38–59.
Google Scholar
 
 
91.
Safargaliev, E., Aetdinova, R., Karimova, A. (2019). Indicators of financial security of small and medium enterprises, Rev. San Gregorio 34, 81–88.
Google Scholar
 
 
92.
SAGCOT, (2013). A Framework for Agriculture Green Growth: Greenprint for SAGCOT, Dar es Salaam: SAGCOT.
Google Scholar
 
 
93.
Sapna, D., Nivedita, G. (2019). Effects of Inclusion of Delay in the Imposition of Environmental Tax on the Emission of Greenhouse Gases. Chaos, Solitons Fractals 125, 41–53. doi:10.1016/s0960-0779(19)30214-0.
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
94.
Schipper, E.L.F., Tanner, T., Dube, O. PAdams, K.M., Huq, S. (2020). The Debate: Is Global Development Adapting to Climate Change? World Development Perspectives 18: 100205.
Google Scholar
 
 
95.
Silverman, D. (2005). Doing Qualitative Research, 2nd ed.; Sage Publications: London, UK.
Google Scholar
 
 
96.
Stephenson, J., Upton, S. (2010). Strategies for Green Growth: Framing and Issues. OECD.
Google Scholar
 
 
97.
Stern, N. (2007). The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach. Conclusions and Recommendations, TEEB.
Google Scholar
 
 
98.
Thuan, N.Q., Trung, N.X. (2012). Green Economy in the Renovation of Growth Model and Restructure of Vietnamese Economy in the Coming Period. Workshop Spring Economic Forum 2012: Vietnam Economy: Aggressive Start-Up for the Restructure of the Economy, The National Assembly Committee, Danang, 7-8 April 2012.
Google Scholar
 
 
99.
Toppinen, A., D’Amato, D., Stern, T. (2020). Forest-based circular bioeconomy: matching sustainability challenges and novel business opportunities? For. Pol. Econ. 100(102041). https://doi.org/10.1016/j. forpol.2019.102041.
Google Scholar
 
 
100.
Tuan, B.Q. (2011). Exploitation and Usage of Green Energy in Vietnam. International Conference Proceeding Green Growth Strategy in Korea and Implications for Vietnam, Eastern North of Asia Study Institute.
Google Scholar
 
 
101.
Tuan, N.A. (2013). Policies and Solutions for Renewable Energy Development in Vietnam. http://www.ievn. com/tin-tuc/Chinh-sach-va-giai-phap-thuc-day-phat-trien-nang-luong-tai-tao-o-viet-nam-5-1029.aspx.
Google Scholar
 
 
102.
UNEP, (2010). Green Economy: Driving the Green Economy through Public Finance and Fiscal Policy Reform. UNEP, Nairobi. H. T. Ngoc, N. T. Anh 45.
Google Scholar
 
 
103.
UNEP, (2011), Towards a Green Economy: Pathways to Sustainable Development and Poverty Eradication, www.unep.org/greeneconomy.
Google Scholar
 
 
104.
UNESCO, (2011). From Green Economies to Green Societies. Paris: UNESCO.
Google Scholar
 
 
105.
UNIDO, (2012). Toward Green Growth through Green Industry Development in Vietnam. http://www.unido. org/fileadmin/user_media_upgrade/Worldwide/Offices/ASIA_and_PACIFIC/vn_Green_Growth_ Through_Green_Industry_Development_in_VietNam_June2012.pdf [2].
Google Scholar
 
 
106.
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). (2011). Towards a GREEN Economy. Pathways to Sustainable Development and Poverty Eradication. A Synthesis for Policy Makers. Accessed on 8 January 2018 at: https: //sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/126GER_synthesis_en.pdf ().
Google Scholar
 
 
107.
United Nations, (2015). Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. http://www. un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang=E.
Google Scholar
 
 
108.
Velenturf, A.P.M., Archer, S.A., Gomes, H.I., Christgen, B., Lag-Brotons, A.J., Purnell, P., (2019). Circular economy and the matter of integrated resources. Sci. Total Environ. 689, 963–969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. scitotenv.2019.06.449.
Google Scholar
 
 
109.
Wang, Y., Zhi, Q. (2016). The Role of Green Finance in Environmental Protection: Two Aspects of Market Mechanism and Policies, Energy Procedia 104, 311–316. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2016.12.053
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
110.
Watson, M. (2006). Protecting the Environment: The Role of Environmental Management Systems. J. R. Soc. Promot. Health, 126, 280–284.
Google Scholar
 
 
111.
World Bank, (2019). Tanzania 2019: Country Environmental Analysis. Environmental Trends and Threats, and Pathways to Improved Sustainability, Washington, DC: World Bank.
Google Scholar
 
 
112.
Xie, T., .Liu, J. (2019). How does Green Credit Affect China’s Green Economic Growth? China Popul. Resour. Environ. 29(09), 83–90. doi:10.12062/cpre.20190501.
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
113.
Yan, D., Kong, Y., Ren, X., Shi, Y., Chiang, S. (2019). The determinants of urban sustainability in Chinese resource-based cities: A panel quantile regression approach. Sci. Total Environ., 686, 1210–1219.
Google Scholar
 
 
114.
Yan, D., Ren, X., Kong, Y., Ye, B., Liao, Z. (2020). The heterogeneous effects of socioeconomic determinants on PM2.5 concentrations using a two-step panel quantile regression. Appl. Energy, 272, 115246.
Google Scholar
 
 
115.
Yang, H., ,Jiang, L. (2021). Digital Economy, Spatial Effect and Total Factor Productivity. Stat. Res. 38(04), 3–15. doi:10.19343/j.cnki.11-1302/c.2021.04.001.
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
116.
Zhang, F. (2017). Theoretical and Empirical Research on the Influence of Financial Development on Green Total Factor Productivity. China Soft Sci. 32(09), 154–167.
Google Scholar
 
 
117.
Zhao, Y., Peng, B., Elahi, E., Wan, A. (2021). Does The Extended Producer Responsibility System Promote the Green Technological Innovation of Enterprises? An Empirical Study Based on the Difference-in-Differences Model. J. Clean. Prod. 319 (128631). doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128631.
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
118.
Ziegler, A. (2017). Economic Calculus or Personal and Social Values? A Micro-Econometric Analysis of the Acceptance of Climate and Energy Policy Measures; MAGKS Joint Discussion Paper Series in Economics. Marburg, Germany: Philipps University Marburg, School of Business and Economics.
Google Scholar
 
 
Udostępnij
Wyślij mailem
ARTYKUŁ POWIĄZANY
WYBRANE RODZAJE INWESTYCJI UMOŻLIWIAJĄCYCH ROZWÓJ BIOGOSPODARKI W REGIONIE
Indeksy
 
Indeks słów kluczowych
Indeks dziedzin
Indeks autorów
eISSN:2451-182X
ISSN:2083-3725
„Zwiększenie udziału zagranicznych recenzentów w czasopiśmie Economic and Regional Studies/ Studia Ekonomiczne i Regionalne - zadanie finansowane w ramach umowy Nr 583/P-DUN/2017 ze środków Ministra Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę”.

„Digitalizacja czasopisma Economic and Regional Studies/ Studia Ekonomiczne i Regionalne – zadanie finansowane w ramach umowy Nr 819/P-DUN/2018 ze środków Ministra Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę”.

© 2006-2023 Journal hosting platform by Bentus