PL EN
 
1/2026 vol. 19
Statystyki
CC-BY 4.0
Pobierz cytowanie
ARTYKUŁ ORYGINALNY
Skuteczność technik gospodarowania odpadami dla zrównoważonej przedsiębiorczości: badanie empiryczne z wykorzystaniem modelowania równań strukturalnych
Kishor Krishna Das 1
,
 
CHHAYA DEVI 2
,
 
Manoj Kumar 3
 
 
 
Więcej
Ukryj
1
Department of Finance,, Assistant Professor, Commerce college, Kokrajhar, India
 
2
Humanities and Social Sciences, National Institute of Technology, Hamirpur, India
 
3
Department of mechanical engineering, ABES College Ghaziabad
 
 
Data nadesłania: 11-08-2025
 
 
Data ostatniej rewizji: 25-09-2025
 
 
Data akceptacji: 16-10-2025
 
 
Data publikacji online: 06-05-2026
 
 
Data publikacji: 06-05-2026
 
 
Autor do korespondencji
Kishor Krishna Das   

Department of Finance,, Assistant Professor, Commerce college, Kokrajhar, India
 
 
Economic and Regional Studies 2026;19(1):86-108
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ers-2026-0005
 
 
Artykuł (PDF, 828.38 kB)
Referencje (85)
 
SŁOWA KLUCZOWE
modelowanie równań strukturalnych
zrównoważona przedsiębiorczość
praktyki w zakresie gospodarki odpadami
SPSS-AMOS
 
KODY KLASYFIKACJI JEL
Economics
Sustainability
 
DZIEDZINY
STRESZCZENIE
Przedmiot i cel pracy: Niewłaściwe gospodarowanie odpadami stanowi poważny problem środowiskowy. Na całym świecie gminy coraz częściej wdrażają inteligentne technologie gospodarowania odpadami, aby odciążyć systemy zbiórki odpadów. Niniejsze badanie dotyczy roli przedsiębiorców w sektorze komunalnych odpadów stałych w mieście Kokrajhar w stanie Assam. Materiały i metody: Zastosowano podejście ilościowe, gromadząc dane za pomocą ustrukturyzowanego kwestionariusza, który rozdano 600 gospodarstwom domowym przy użyciu metody losowego doboru próby. Wyniki: Narzędzie wykazało się doskonałą rzetelnością, a współczynniki rzetelności poszczególnych pozycji wynosiły od 0,880 do 0,916, czyli znacznie powyżej przyjętego progu wynoszącego 0,70. Współczynnik Kaisera-Meyera-Olkina (KMO) wyniósł 0,808, co wskazuje na wysoką adekwatność próby do analizy czynnikowej. Wnioski: Niniejsze badanie stanowi wkład w zrównoważone gospodarowanie odpadami komunalnymi, podkreślając rolę przedsiębiorców w Kokrajhar w stanie Assam. Analizuje ono, w jaki sposób świadomość gospodarstw domowych oraz strategie przedsiębiorców wpływają na praktyki związane z gospodarką odpadami.
REFERENCJE (85)
1.
Addas, A., Alotaibi, B., Alharkan, I., & Alharkan, M. (2024). Smart city applications in solid waste management: Enhancing efficiency through IoT integration. Journal of Environmental Management, 337, 118978.
Google Scholar
 
 
2.
Agarwal, A., & Pandey, R. (2021). Urban solid waste management in India: Problems and prospects. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(32), 44116-44129.
Google Scholar
 
 
3.
Ali, M., Sharma, R., & Khan, F. (2024). Urban solid waste management in Indian cities: Current practices and future challenges. Journal of Environmental Management, 345, 119842.
Google Scholar
 
 
4.
Arosemena, E., Rosell, J., Parés, M., & Oliveras, J. (2024). Urban agriculture and compost use: Circular strategies in the Metropolitan Area of Barcelona. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 197, 106052.
Google Scholar
 
 
5.
Babbie, E. R. (2020). The practice of social research (15th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Google Scholar
 
 
6.
Balaganesh, G., Krishnamurthy, L., & Ramamoorthy, M. (2023). Advancements in recycling and composting technologies for sustainable waste management. Journal of Environmental Engineering and Technology, 14(2), 112-125.
Google Scholar
 
 
7.
Basak, S., Ghosh, A., & Das, P. (2024). Community participation in sustainable waste management: A case study from eastern India. Waste Management & Research, 42(1), 45-58.
Google Scholar
 
 
8.
Bisinella, V., Conradsen, K. N., Damgaard, A., & Astrup, T. F. (2023). Life cycle assessment in waste management: Comparative models and system boundaries. Waste Management, 155, 244-255.
Google Scholar
 
 
9.
Boadi, O., K., & Kuitunen, M. (2005). Environmental and health impacts of household solid waste handling and disposal practices in third world cities: The case of the Accra metropolitan area, Ghana. Journal of Environmental Health, 32.
Google Scholar
 
 
10.
Bocken, N., M., P., Short, S., W., Rana, P., & Evans, S. (2014). A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 42-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle...
Google Scholar
 
 
11.
Cohen, B. (2006). Sustainable valley entrepreneurial ecosystems. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.42....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
12.
Connett, P. (2013). Zero waste 2020: Sustainability in our hands. In Motivating change: Sustainable design and behavior in the built environment (p. 202). Earthscan Publication.
Google Scholar
 
 
13.
Creswell, J., W., & Creswell, J., D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Google Scholar
 
 
14.
Dangelico, R., M., & Pujari, D. (2010). Mainstreaming green product innovation: Why and how companies integrate environmental sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(3), 471-486.
Google Scholar
 
 
15.
Daniel, S. D. (2018). Real-time communication and incentive systems for municipal waste collection optimization. Waste Management Innovations, 34(2), 220-228.
Google Scholar
 
 
16.
Das, S. (2020). Municipal waste management in India: Policy gaps and citizen involvement. Environmental Policy and Governance, 30(6), 321-334.
Google Scholar
 
 
17.
Dean, T., J., & McMullen, J., S. (2007). Toward a theory of sustainable entrepreneurship: Reducing environmental degradation through entrepreneurial action. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(1), 50-76.
Google Scholar
 
 
18.
Devi, C., Sharma, M., & Gupta, Y. (2025). Analyzing the influence of economic and non-economic determinants on willingness to save in financial institutions: A study using structural equation modeling (SEM). International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 16, 2702-2719. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
19.
Ferronato, N., & Torretta, V. (2019). Waste mismanagement in developing countries: A review of global issues. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(6), 1060.
Google Scholar
 
 
20.
Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
Google Scholar
 
 
21.
George, G., McGahan, A. M., & Prabhu, J. (2012). Innovation for inclusive growth: Towards a theoretical framework and a research agenda. Journal of Management Studies, 49(4), 661-683. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
22.
Gómez-Sanabria, A., & Lindl, M. (2024). Preventing aquatic waste pollution through improved municipal waste management. Science of The Total Environment, 899, 165432.
Google Scholar
 
 
23.
González-Sánchez, R., Jiménez-Parra, B., & Gallego-Schmid, A. (2023). Advancing sustainable waste management within the SDG framework: A circular economy approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 407, 136743.
Google Scholar
 
 
24.
Guerrero, L., A., Maas, G., & Hogland, W. (2013). Solid waste management challenges for cities in developing countries. Waste Management, 33(1), 220-232.
Google Scholar
 
 
25.
Gupta, N., Yadav, K., K., & Kumar, V. (2015). A review on current status of municipal solid waste management in India. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 37, 206-217.
Google Scholar
 
 
26.
Hair, J., F., Black, W., C., Babin, B., J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Google Scholar
 
 
27.
Hall, J., K., Daneke, G., A., & Lenox, M., J. (2010). Sustainable development and entrepreneurship: Past contributions and future directions. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(5), 439-448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbus....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
28.
Hockerts, K., & Wüstenhagen, R. (2010). Greening Goliaths versus emerging Davids: Theorizing about the role of incumbents and new entrants in sustainable entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(5), 481-492.
Google Scholar
 
 
29.
Hu, L., T., & Bentler, P., M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/107055....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
30.
Ingale, P., Deshmukh, R., & Joshi, N. (2024). Smart waste technologies: Role of IoT in Indian waste management. Journal of Environmental Engineering and Technology, 15(3), 215-228.
Google Scholar
 
 
31.
Ishak, S., & Dadson, A., V. (2014). Households’ awareness and perception of sanitation bylaws in Ghana: Evidence from Kumasi metropolis. Research Journal of Environmental and Earth Sciences, 6(8), 402-407.
Google Scholar
 
 
32.
Jain, R., & Shah, S. (2019). Barriers to sustainable waste management practices in Indian MSMEs: A qualitative study. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 26(6), 502-510.
Google Scholar
 
 
33.
Jones, G., G., & Spadafora, A. (2014). Waste, recycling and entrepreneurship in Central and Northern Europe, 1870-1940. Harvard Business School General Management Unit Working Paper No. 14-084.
Google Scholar
 
 
34.
Joshi, A., Kale, S., Chandel, S., & Pal, D., K. (2015). Likert scale: Explored and explained. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, 7(4), 396-403.
Google Scholar
 
 
35.
Kamiya, N., Takahashi, S., & Yamamoto, K. (2010). Electronic tagging for real-time waste monitoring in urban systems. Waste Technology Journal, 22(4), 334-340.
Google Scholar
 
 
36.
Kautonen, T., Tornikoski, E., T., & Kibler, E. (2011). Entrepreneurial intentions in the third age: The impact of perceived age norms. Small Business Economics, 37(2), 219-234.
Google Scholar
 
 
37.
Kline, R., B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press.
Google Scholar
 
 
38.
Kothari, C., R., & Garg, G. (2019). Research methodology: Methods and techniques (4th ed.). New Age International Publishers.
Google Scholar
 
 
39.
Kripesh, A., S., Mahesh Prabhu, H., & Sriram, K. V. (2020). An empirical study on the effect of product information and perceived usefulness on purchase intention during online shopping in India. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 21(4), 509-522.
Google Scholar
 
 
40.
Kumar, A., & Agrawal, A. (2020). Status of municipal solid waste generation and its management practices in India: A review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 10236-10249.
Google Scholar
 
 
41.
Kumar, M., Vipin, N., & Agarwal, A. (2024). A fuzzy AHP approach for assessing the reliability of financial services. Journal of Financial Analytics, 12(1), 45-59.
Google Scholar
 
 
42.
Kumar, M., Vipin, N., & Agarwal, A. (2024). Evaluating quality and availability in digital finance using fuzzy models. International Journal of Financial Studies, 10(2), 88-101.
Google Scholar
 
 
43.
Kumar, M., Vipin, N., & Agarwal, A. (2024). Supply chain management and its role in rail transport. E3S Web of Conferences, 556, 01050. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3scon....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
44.
Li, Y. (2024). The impact of circular waste systems on greenhouse gas mitigation in China. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 26(2), 183-199.
Google Scholar
 
 
45.
Lim, Y., J., Osman, A., Salahuddin, S., N., Romle, A., R., & Abdullah, S. (2015). Factors influencing online shopping behavior: The mediating role of purchase intention. Procedia Economics and Finance, 35, 401-410.
Google Scholar
 
 
46.
Meena, A., Kumar, A., & Sharma, R. (2023). Waste-to-wealth through entrepreneurship: India’s roadmap to sustainability. Sustainable Futures, 5, 100085.
Google Scholar
 
 
47.
Mondal, S., Das, S., & Banerjee, R. (2023). Green entrepreneurship and circular economy adoption in Indian MSMEs: Opportunities and policy frameworks. Journal of Cleaner Production, 412, 137310.
Google Scholar
 
 
48.
Murray, A., Skene, K., & Haynes, K. (2017). The circular economy: An interdisciplinary exploration of the concept and application in a global context. Journal of Business Ethics, 140(3), 369-380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
49.
Neumeyer, X., & Santos, S. C. (2018). Sustainable business models, venture typologies, and entrepreneurial ecosystems: A financial network perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 4565-4579.
Google Scholar
 
 
50.
Nunnally, J., C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Google Scholar
 
 
51.
Ogawa, H. (2005). Sustainable solid waste management in developing countries. United Nations Centre for Regional Development (UNCRD), Nagoya, Japan.
Google Scholar
 
 
52.
Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS survival manual (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Google Scholar
 
 
53.
Patel, S., Mehta, A., & Sinha, R. (2014). Vermifiltration and vermicomposting technologies for rural wastewater treatment in India. Ecological Engineering, 64, 158-169.
Google Scholar
 
 
54.
Prabusankar, S. (2024). Waste-to-energy systems in India: Challenges and opportunities. Energy & Environment Journal, 35(1), 101-120.
Google Scholar
 
 
55.
Presser, S., Couper, M., P., Lessler, J., T., Martin, E., Martin, J., Rothgeb, J., M., & Singer, E. (2004). Methods for testing and evaluating survey questions. Public Opinion Quarterly, 68(1), 109-130.
Google Scholar
 
 
56.
Ray, R., Chatterjee, P., & Sen, A. (2021). Evaluating municipal governance capacity for waste management. Public Administration Review, 81(2), 323-336.
Google Scholar
 
 
57.
Salem, A., Alharbi, M., & Kumar, A. (2023). Artificial intelligence and automated sorting in solid waste management: Enhancing material recovery and sustainability. Waste Management & Research, 41(12), 1572-1583.
Google Scholar
 
 
58.
Santos, F., M. (2012). A positive theory of social entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(3), 335-351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
59.
Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2011). Sustainable entrepreneurship and sustainability innovation: Categories and interactions. Business Strategy and the Environment, 20(4), 222-237. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.68....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
60.
Sharholy, M., Ahmad, K., Mahmood, G., & Trivedi, R. C. (2008). Municipal solid waste management in Indian cities – A review. Waste Management, 28(2), 459-467.
Google Scholar
 
 
61.
Sharma, A., & Shah, K., W. (2020). Solid waste management in India: A review. International Journal of Environmental Sciences, 6(5), 723-736.
Google Scholar
 
 
62.
Sharma, M., & Jain, R. (2021). Evaluating the role of public participation in solid waste management: A case study in semi-urban India. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 64(7), 1234-1252.
Google Scholar
 
 
63.
Sharma, P., Malhotra, S., & Kapoor, A. (2021). A critical review of waste management practices in Indian urban centers. Environmental Research and Development, 12(1), 50-65.
Google Scholar
 
 
64.
Shepherd, D., A., Saade, F., P., & Wincent, J. (2021). Thinking about entrepreneurial decision making: Review and research agenda. Academy of Management Perspectives, 35(3), 406-430. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.20....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
65.
Singh, R., K., & Gupta, A. (2020). Assessment of household solid waste management practices in developing countries: A case study of India. Environmental Management and Sustainable Development, 9(2), 25-39.
Google Scholar
 
 
66.
Singh, R., Mehta, P., & Agarwal, S. (2024). The impact of Swachh Bharat Abhiyan on urban sanitation awareness in India. Journal of Urban Management, 13(1), 34-42.
Google Scholar
 
 
67.
Sondh, S., K., Kumar, A., & Mishra, V. (2024). Promoting the 4Rs through circular business models in municipal solid waste management. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26, 543-562.
Google Scholar
 
 
68.
Suchowska-Kisielewicz, M., & Jędrczak, A. (2023). Municipal waste recycling targets under the EU Waste Framework Directive: Progress and challenges. Waste Management, 159, 65-74.
Google Scholar
 
 
69.
Swathika, P., Kumar, V., & Rani, M. (2024). Health risks and inefficiencies in manual waste sorting: A review of Indian practices. International Journal of Environmental Health Research, 34(2), 123-135.
Google Scholar
 
 
70.
Taro, S. (2002). Centralized electronic systems for efficient waste coordination. Waste Management & Research, 20(6), 547-555.
Google Scholar
 
 
71.
Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53-55.
Google Scholar
 
 
72.
Tirkolaee, E., B., Mooseloo, F., M., & Sadeghi, S. (2024). Decision support systems for sustainable waste logistics using co-modal transportation networks. Journal of Environmental Informatics, 43(1), 100-115.
Google Scholar
 
 
73.
UN Habitat. (2018). Waste wise cities: Best practices in municipal solid waste management. United Nations Human Settlements Programme.
Google Scholar
 
 
74.
United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. https:// sdgs.un.org/2030agenda.
Google Scholar
 
 
75.
Verma, R., & Tiwari, P. (2023). E-waste management in India: Policy review and integration strategies. Environmental Policy and Governance, 33(1), 21-34.
Google Scholar
 
 
76.
Wen, L., C., Lin, H., & Lee, S. C. (2009). Review of recycling performance indicators: A study on collection rate in Taiwan. Waste Management, 29(8), 2248-2256.
Google Scholar
 
 
77.
Wilson, D., C., Velis, C., & Cheeseman, C. (2006). Role of informal sector recycling in waste management in developing countries. Habitat International, 30(4), 797-808.
Google Scholar
 
 
78.
Wittmayer, J., M., & Schäpke, N. (2014). Action, research, and participation: Roles of researchers in sustainability transitions. Sustainability Science, 9(4), 483-496.
Google Scholar
 
 
79.
Yukalang, N., Clarke, B., & Ross, K. (2018). Barriers to effective municipal solid waste management in a rapidly urbanizing area in Thailand. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(3), 548.
Google Scholar
 
 
80.
Zaman, A. U., & Lehmann, S. (2011). Urban growth and waste management optimization towards zero waste city’. City, Culture and Society, 2(4), 177-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccs.....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
81.
Zaman, A., U., & Lehmann, S. (2013). The zero-waste index: A performance measurement tool for waste management systems in a “zero waste city.” Journal of Cleaner Production, 50, 123-132.
Google Scholar
 
 
82.
Zurbrugg, C., Gfrerer, M., Ashadi, H., Brenner, W., & Kühr, R. (2012). Determinants of sustainability in solid waste management – The Gianyar Waste Recovery Project in Indonesia. Waste Management, 32(11), 2126-2133.
Google Scholar
 
 
83.
World Health Organization. (2017). Inadequate waste disposal and health impacts. WHO Bulletin. https://www.who.int/.
Google Scholar
 
 
84.
Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs, Government of India. (2022). Swachh Bharat Mission – Urban guidelines. https://sbmurban.gov.in.
Google Scholar
 
 
85.
Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs. (2019). Swachh. Swachh Bharat Mission Urban Guidelines. Government of India. https://swachhbharatmission.go...
Google Scholar
 
 
Udostępnij
Wyślij mailem
Indeksy
 
Indeks słów kluczowych
Indeks dziedzin
Indeks autorów
eISSN:2451-182X
ISSN:2083-3725
Journals System - logo
„Zwiększenie udziału zagranicznych recenzentów w czasopiśmie Economic and Regional Studies/ Studia Ekonomiczne i Regionalne - zadanie finansowane w ramach umowy Nr 583/P-DUN/2017 ze środków Ministra Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę”.

„Digitalizacja czasopisma Economic and Regional Studies/ Studia Ekonomiczne i Regionalne – zadanie finansowane w ramach umowy Nr 819/P-DUN/2018 ze środków Ministra Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę”.

© 2006-2026 Journal hosting platform by Bentus
Scroll to top